Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 11:39

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
The Sun Is Causing Starlink Satellites To Drop From Space - Daily Kos
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
4 Ups & 5 Downs From WWE SmackDown (6 June - Results & Review) - WhatCulture.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Big brands are staying quiet this Pride Month - CNN
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Mario Kart 64's Unofficial PC Port Is Amazing - Kotaku
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Et expedita consequatur quam et.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
FDA rushed out agency-wide AI tool—it’s not going well - Ars Technica
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Blumhouse Reveals Trailer And Poster For ‘Black Phone 2’ - Deadline